Skip to content

About ApnaCodex

Templates that survive contact with real projects

ApnaCodex exists because most templates are demos: beautiful until you add real data, real permissions and a client who publishes 2,000 words on a services page. We build for that day instead.

Our quality promise

Every template we publish is scoped from screens real teams need, designed inside a token system, and reviewed by a second engineer before it goes on sale. Nothing ships with unresolved checklist items.

We would rather publish thirteen templates we can defend line by line than a hundred variations of the same landing page. The catalog grows slowly and on purpose.

When you buy, you get the full TypeScript source with no obfuscation, no telemetry and no required account in the code. It is yours to read, extend and delete.

See the catalog

Principles

Four commitments behind every release

These are the things we refuse to trade away for a faster release.

01

Production-minded UI

Loading, empty, error and permission states are designed before the happy path. Nothing looks finished only when the data is perfect.

02

Clean architecture

Feature-oriented folders, a single service boundary and typed data models. You can find things, and you can delete things.

03

Responsive by default

Every screen is reviewed from 320px to ultrawide, including dense tables, filter panels and multi-step forms.

04

Documentation & updates

Written setup and architecture notes per template, versioned releases and a changelog you can actually read.

Workflow

How a template gets made

Four stages, roughly six to ten weeks per template depending on screen count.

  1. 01

    Scope from real products

    Every template starts from screens real teams need, not from a moodboard. We list the flows first, then design them.

  2. 02

    Design in the token system

    Typography, spacing and color are defined once. Components are built as variants, never as one-off overrides.

  3. 03

    Build for handover

    Feature folders, typed models and a single service boundary, reviewed by a second engineer before release.

  4. 04

    Audit, then publish

    Accessibility, responsive and performance passes against our checklist. Anything unresolved blocks the release.

Release checklist

Nine checks between finished and published

We publish the checklist because it is the actual difference between a template and a demo. Any unresolved item blocks the release.

  • Keyboard navigable with visible focus order
  • WCAG AA contrast in light and dark themes
  • Loading, empty, error and permission states designed
  • No hardcoded colors outside the token file
  • Responsive review at 320, 768, 1280 and 1920px
  • Reduced-motion alternative for every animation
  • TypeScript strict mode with no suppressed errors
  • Lighthouse performance reviewed on a throttled connection
  • Dependencies audited and kept to a deliberate minimum

The team

A small studio, not a content farm

Six people work on the catalog. We describe roles rather than names while the marketplace is pre-launch.

2 designers

Product design

Typography, spacing systems, interaction detail and dark-mode parity.

3 engineers

Frontend engineering

Architecture, accessibility, performance budgets and code review.

1 reviewer

Review & QA

Checklist audits, responsive passes and release sign-off.